Chess - advice for a beginner?

[Callum Todd]

I have recently endeavoured to take up chess. Not as a serious pursuit - I don't have a lot of time to put into it - but I'd like to start playing it a bit as a side-hobby and see if I can become halfway decent at it.

I imagine there's a fair few chess aficionados among you lot. Any hints and tips for a chess rookie?

[Gavin Chipper]

Improve your co-ordination.

[Neil Bellers]

Hello and welcome to the chess world. Advice = play to enjoy, and not to get bogged down
in too much theory. Use the rooks early; they are powerful pieces and should not be left stuck
in the corners. Search out the chess puzzle columnists eg Times, and the veteran Leonard Barden =
Evening Standard / Guardian archives to see how the top players solve in-game problems.
Tal was the magnificent tactical charger to bust open defences.
Take a portable board (visit the Chess Shop in Baker Street, London) to cafes etc
and see if anyone challenges you to a game eg for the price of a cup of coffee.
I have just been an average player, now 60 years old, but still cannot understand
why television does not devote at least ten minutes per day to a worthwhile, and cheap for production,
regular show. The UK has produced some great players in the last 150 years or so.
There is a lot of potential, male and female players, in hundreds of schools for chess awareness and expansion
in the media.
For a good start, set up the chess board the right way round !
Best wishes

[Jon O'Neill]

If you're bad and want to become below-average like me: Learn the main tactical motifs. Then do simple tactical puzzles (i.e. shouldn't take more than 5 seconds to solve) for hours and hours (it can be fun for someone of our ilk).

[David Williams]

The trouble with knowing how to solve the tactical positions you will see in a newspaper is that you will only get to one of those positions very rarely, and only if you have outplayed your opponent up to that point. In any case a game between two beginners is usually just a succession of blunders, the game being lost by the player who makes the first/worst/last one. (It's fair to say that Magnus Carlsen probably views a game between two lower ranking grandmasters the same way. It depends on how bad a move has to be to be termed a blunder.)

I'm not up to date enough to give you a specific recommendation, but get yourself a 'Chess for Beginners' book to familiarise yourself with general principles. If it becomes second nature to develop your pieces, double your rooks, blockade that pawn, you've a lot more chance of reaching a position where it's you that has the tactical kill available. And play through annotated games, trying to work out why the players have played the moves they did, and why it worked or didn't work.

[L'oisleatch McGraw]

Is COUNTDOWN worthy of respect as a game?

I have recently endeavoured to take up chess.

No Callum, it is!
Countdown is worthy of respect as a game. Don't abandon it on my account!

[Jon O'Neill]

The trouble with knowing how to solve the tactical positions you will see in a newspaper is that you will only get to one of those positions very rarely, and only if you have outplayed your opponent up to that point. In any case a game between two beginners is usually just a succession of blunders, the game being lost by the player who makes the first/worst/last one. (It's fair to say that Magnus Carlsen probably views a game between two lower ranking grandmasters the same way. It depends on how bad a move has to be to be termed a blunder.)

I'm not up to date enough to give you a specific recommendation, but get yourself a 'Chess for Beginners' book to familiarise yourself with general principles. If it becomes second nature to develop your pieces, double your rooks, blockade that pawn, you've a lot more chance of reaching a position where it's you that has the tactical kill available. And play through annotated games, trying to work out why the players have played the moves they did, and why it worked or didn't work.

You're right about newspaper tactics... I should've been more detailed but when I said tactics I meant the very simple tactics. They should be very easily solved - i.e. in less than 3 seconds. Learning to count material, then spotting forks and skewers, and so on. There's a website called Chess Tempo which is free and perfect for what I mean. You'll get fed problems that are at your level, and you can see your rating improve over time.

I spent a long time doing the annotated games thing, and worrying about general principles, without much improvement in my rating. After spending some hours doing tactical problems my rating shot up (still shit but significantly less so). But up to a very high level all games are decided by blunt instrument tactics.. first pieces left hanging and abject failures of board vision, then very simple tactical ideas, and so on as the margins get thinner, as you said.

[Phil Makepeace]

Any hints and tips for a chess rookie?

- Do the interactive lessons and practice modules under the Learn tab on lichess.org
- Repeat
- Play online at a reasonable pace but probably no faster than 10 minutes each until you’re zoned in a bit more
- Don’t shy away from material aimed at children. They often contain really good mnemonics and easy ways to code the info, and they’re bound to be engaging
- Play as much as you can over the board, otherwise you won’t develop 3D vision in addition to the online 2D stuff

While I’m here, just gonna say that I have a new chess podcast available on all good platforms called The Chesspit. Give us a listen and a subscribe.

[L'oisleatch McGraw]

called The Chesspit. Give us a listen and a subscribe.

Epic name!

[Callum Todd]

Any hints and tips for a chess rookie?

- Do the interactive lessons and practice modules under the Learn tab on lichess.org
- Repeat
- Play online at a reasonable pace but probably no faster than 10 minutes each until you’re zoned in a bit more
- Don’t shy away from material aimed at children. They often contain really good mnemonics and easy ways to code the info, and they’re bound to be engaging
- Play as much as you can over the board, otherwise you won’t develop 3D vision in addition to the online 2D stuff

While I’m here, just gonna say that I have a new chess podcast available on all good platforms called The Chesspit. Give us a listen and a subscribe.

That's great; thanks very much Phil. I have been using lichess.org (thanks to recommendation by Matty Artell) and have played through the lessons and practise modules once so far. Onto repeat!

Will definitely give your podcast a listen.

called The Chesspit. Give us a listen and a subscribe.

Epic name!

Indeed!

[Callum Todd]

Listened to Episode 1, now on number 2. This is great Phil! Even got some Leeds chat in

[Phil Makepeace]

Thanks, Callum

[Paul Worsley]

The Russians, who still produce the most top players in the world, learn the game backwards. That is they learn endgame first, middle game next and only then move on to openings.

If you're just playing for fun, don't get bogged down learning openings, just the basics. ie control of the centre, rapid development of pieces, castle the king etc

Make sure you know how to checkmate with a winning position, eg KQ vK, KR v K, KPR v K

Also, make sure you know how to win KP v K.

Learn some middle game tactics, The fork, The pin, The skewer etc

Once you know these things you'll be well ahead of most recreational players.

[Gavin Chipper]

The knight can jump over other pieces.

[Noel Mc]

I'm looking for some way to run a chess tournament for pupils, a few parameters if possible:
- No chat function
- I want to ideally be able to share a URL for two pupils to play eachother
- Free
- Easy to sign up - pupils all have a school Google account, so that could be easily used.

Anyone able to help??

[Sam Cappleman-Lynes]

LiChess is completely free, has a feature where you can create a challenge via URL, and although it does have chat I think accounts can be configured so that it is disabled.

[Graeme Cole]

I'm 9 episodes into this inaccurately-named "speedrun" of chess by Daniel Naroditsky.

He's a grandmaster, playing on chess.com under a pseudonym, starting with a very low rating, playing against players of similar ratings*. As he plays, working his way up the ratings ladder, he talks through the tactics he's using, the mistakes his opponent is making, and how he's exploiting them. Despite the length of the episodes it's very fast-paced and there's a huge amount of chess packed in to the time. If you're someone of a novice rating who knows the rules and some basic concepts, but want to learn "why do I keep getting beaten?" the first few episodes should be very instructive.

* I don't know how he gets round the rule I would expect chess.com has against doing this, but he does say at the start of one of the videos that all ratings points he wins get refunded somehow.

[Gavin Chipper]

I'm 9 episodes into this inaccurately-named "speedrun" of chess by Daniel Naroditsky.

He's a grandmaster, playing on chess.com under a pseudonym, starting with a very low rating, playing against players of similar ratings*. As he plays, working his way up the ratings ladder, he talks through the tactics he's using, the mistakes his opponent is making, and how he's exploiting them. Despite the length of the episodes it's very fast-paced and there's a huge amount of chess packed in to the time. If you're someone of a novice rating who knows the rules and some basic concepts, but want to learn "why do I keep getting beaten?" the first few episodes should be very instructive.

* I don't know how he gets round the rule I would expect chess.com has against doing this, but he does say at the start of one of the videos that all ratings points he wins get refunded somehow.

What rule would you expect it to have? You mean he has two accounts? Otherwise just being really good and having a low rating (regardless of what name you use) is inevitable when a good player signs up to the site.

[Graeme Cole]

I'm 9 episodes into this inaccurately-named "speedrun" of chess by Daniel Naroditsky.

He's a grandmaster, playing on chess.com under a pseudonym, starting with a very low rating, playing against players of similar ratings*. As he plays, working his way up the ratings ladder, he talks through the tactics he's using, the mistakes his opponent is making, and how he's exploiting them. Despite the length of the episodes it's very fast-paced and there's a huge amount of chess packed in to the time. If you're someone of a novice rating who knows the rules and some basic concepts, but want to learn "why do I keep getting beaten?" the first few episodes should be very instructive.

* I don't know how he gets round the rule I would expect chess.com has against doing this, but he does say at the start of one of the videos that all ratings points he wins get refunded somehow.

What rule would you expect it to have? You mean he has two accounts? Otherwise just being really good and having a low rating (regardless of what name you use) is inevitable when a good player signs up to the site.

He plays on chess.com using his main account under his own name, yes. I would have assumed they frown upon taking rating points from a low-rated player who has no idea you're a GM, so perhaps that's why he mentioned that rating points get refunded somehow.

[Graeme Cole]

Any hints and tips for a chess rookie?

You can go any distance uppie-downie or leftie-rightie.

[Tim Down]

Any hints and tips for a chess rookie?

You can go any distance uppie-downie or leftie-rightie.

Bravo! Just a shame it took you nearly a year.

[Gavin Chipper]

It was worth the wait.

[Marc Meakin]

After watchibg The Queens Gambit I'm interested what chess players thought of it.

[Mark James]

After watchibg The Queens Gambit I'm interested what chess players thought of it.

I play chess very badly but i definitely enjoyed it. There's loads of cool chess channels on YouTube. I'm on my phone and I can't get the links working for some reason but search for Agadmator's channel. He analyses chess games from history and has featured a few from the show.

Gotham chess is another good one. He has a good few videos about it as well and is overall a good channel for learning chess. They're just two I can think of off my head but there's tons that are worth a look.

Chess.com has added Beth Harmon bots that you can play against. There's a few different bots based on her level at a particular age. I've only beaten the first two so far.

[Mark James]

Feck sake. The Beth Harmon bots seem to be gone.