Breakdown By Format

[Ian Volante]

It might be due to tiredness, but I can't work out what the S and M stand for in the "Breakdown by format" section of the profile. Can someone please inform me?

[Ian Volante]

'Sokay, I've got it now.

And so to bed.

[JimBentley]

These new features (breakdown by format and head to head) are stat-tastic, cheers Charlie! Amazing work!

[Charlie Reams]

[Paul Howe]

These new features (breakdown by format and head to head) are stat-tastic, cheers Charlie! Amazing work!

Agreed, they're brilliant. The scores from the very distant past where no round details are available don't seem to be included in the averages (cf the stat comparison for me vs Kirk)

[Charlie Reams]

The scores from the very distant past where no round details are available don't seem to be included in the averages (cf the stat comparison for me vs Kirk)

Yeah, those are borked. I'm working on it.

[Kirk Bevins]

Yup, I also have to thank Charlie for this feature - It's been great fun comparing head-to-heads. Nice one mate.

[Ian Volante]

Yes, it is indeed good

[Simon Myers]

I'm with the other guys, the stats are great (I especially like the maxes - perhaps expressing them as a percentage too could be a feature?).

One or two "nice-to-have"s would be to get back the old links to the games where a user hit their max score, and perhaps a summary of "last 15 games" or something where you can see if you're improving/on good form.

[Jimmy Gough]

I'd also like to say how good I think it is. Especially looking at head to heads between the best players - some of the words they come up with are just incredible.