Page 2 of 5

Re: Strange Games

Posted: Tue Dec 23, 2008 3:44 am
by Kirk Bevins
Innis Carson wrote:Was meaning the scramble, but I'll remember that as well.
Ah yeah! Awesome!

Re: Strange Games

Posted: Tue Dec 23, 2008 1:32 pm
by Oliver Garner
Prune getting all 3 numbers games
http://www.apterous.org/viewgame.php?game=16453

Re: Strange Games

Posted: Tue Dec 23, 2008 4:51 pm
by Kai Laddiman
Oliver Garner wrote:Prune getting all 3 numbers games
http://www.apterous.org/viewgame.php?game=16453
Lol'd at JUNIORITY ;)

Re: Strange Games

Posted: Tue Dec 23, 2008 4:52 pm
by Kai Laddiman
Innis Carson wrote:http://www.apterous.org/viewgame.php?game=16343

Round 6 is clearly divine intervention.
Amazingly, you missed the same word twice.

Re: Strange Games

Posted: Wed Dec 24, 2008 12:56 pm
by Charlie Reams
This is a strange coincidence: compare this game and the next one. Same players, same score and the exact same cast! What are the chances?!

Re: Strange Games

Posted: Wed Dec 31, 2008 2:11 pm
by Kai Laddiman
I got the same conundrum in two consecutive games!

http://www.apterous.org/viewgame.php?game=17665 (A scrag game)

http://www.apterous.org/viewgame.php?game=17666

Re: Strange Games

Posted: Sat Jan 03, 2009 9:13 pm
by Kai Laddiman
This conundrum scares me really badly. :shock: :!:

Re: Strange Games

Posted: Sat Jan 03, 2009 9:14 pm
by Charlie Reams
Kai Laddiman wrote:This conundrum scares me really badly. :shock: :!:
:?:

Re: Strange Games

Posted: Sat Jan 03, 2009 11:58 pm
by Gavin Chipper
Charlie Reams wrote:
Kai Laddiman wrote:This conundrum scares me really badly. :shock: :!:
:?:
The scramble.

Re: Strange Games

Posted: Sat Jan 03, 2009 11:59 pm
by Kirk Bevins
Gavin Chipper wrote: The scramble.
Ah good spot. I thought you missed ARTICHOKE in one of your games and it's haunting you.

Re: Strange Games

Posted: Fri Jan 23, 2009 10:55 pm
by Ben Wilson

Re: Strange Games

Posted: Sat Jan 24, 2009 9:17 am
by Kai Laddiman
Ben Wilson wrote:umm... hmm!
Super-lolage!

Re: Strange Games

Posted: Thu Feb 05, 2009 4:35 pm
by Charlie Reams

Re: Strange Games

Posted: Wed Feb 18, 2009 4:09 pm
by Ben Wilson
Round one of this game must be unique.

Re: Strange Games

Posted: Wed Feb 18, 2009 5:21 pm
by Kai Laddiman
I'm claiming the longest word spelt out in the letters (AMARETTO).

Re: Strange Games

Posted: Wed Feb 18, 2009 6:31 pm
by Chris Davies
Kai Laddiman wrote:I'm claiming the longest word spelt out in the letters (AMARETTO).

I can match that with BRACONID here. And it wasn't Goatdown :D

This game here has a mix of quite decent playing and complete incompetence from me.

Re: Strange Games

Posted: Wed Feb 18, 2009 9:47 pm
by Jon Corby
Chris Davies wrote:I can match that with BRACONID here.
"I may be barking up some mad tree here, but is BRACONID a word?" - Mel Giedroyc trying to claim a DC word. Useless shithead.

Re: Strange Games

Posted: Wed Feb 18, 2009 9:52 pm
by Callum Laddiman
Ben Wilson wrote:Round one of this game must be unique.
Lol.

Re: Strange Games

Posted: Wed Feb 18, 2009 11:39 pm
by Stuart Arnot
Callum Laddiman wrote:
Ben Wilson wrote:Round one of this game must be unique.
Lol.
I thought similarly about round 12 of this game.

Re: Strange Games

Posted: Fri Feb 20, 2009 6:42 pm
by Martin Gardner
Round five of this game is a strong contender for the best round where it's easy to get one away, but hard to get it spot on.

Re: Strange Games

Posted: Fri Feb 20, 2009 6:51 pm
by JimBentley
Martin Gardner wrote:Round five of this game is a strong contender for the best round where it's easy to get one away, but hard to get it spot on.
Carol's way was bizarre but cool. I'd have done 75+50+10+10-(100/25), much more straightforward.

Re: Strange Games

Posted: Fri Feb 20, 2009 11:59 pm
by Kirk Bevins
JimBentley wrote:
Carol's way was bizarre but cool. I'd have done 75+50+10+10-(100/25), much more straightforward.
Ha we played along with this round in the pub today on Simon's internet phone and I got it Jim's method. I also thought it was hard and bet on both contestants only getting 140 which they did. To be fair I'm not sure I did it in 30 seconds as we don't time, we just scroll through games spending some time on selections trying to hit maximums.

Re: Strange Games

Posted: Sun Feb 22, 2009 3:19 pm
by Ben Wilson
On the grounds that it qualifies as both brag AND scrag, I'm putting it here- http://www.apterous.org/viewgame.php?game=27737 -falling foul of the ODE/CSW differences 3 rounds out of 4 (MODDERS* is the only one that's completely bad), I then put in the final 6 rounds of my dreams. Ho hum.

Re: Strange Games

Posted: Sun Feb 22, 2009 10:38 pm
by Joe Denniss
http://www.apterous.org/viewgame.php?game=26025

Fairly poor game for both of us, culminating with four conundrums at the end. I wanted to keep going for more, but Jimmy decided to take the game.

Re: Strange Games

Posted: Mon Feb 23, 2009 6:52 pm
by Ben Wilson
http://www.apterous.org/viewgame.php?game=28100

Round 7- do I go for the E for FRUITCAKE or the W for 'Sorry Kai'? ;)

Re: Strange Games

Posted: Mon Feb 23, 2009 7:10 pm
by Charlie Reams
Ben Wilson wrote:http://www.apterous.org/viewgame.php?game=28100

Round 7- do I go for the E for FRUITCAKE or the W for 'Sorry Kai'? ;)
Ah that's brilliant. I didn't even know that FUCKWIT was valid.

Re: Strange Games

Posted: Tue Feb 24, 2009 12:54 pm
by Chris Davies
What an excellent conundrum scramble

Re: Strange Games

Posted: Tue Feb 24, 2009 5:24 pm
by Chris Davies
http://www.apterous.org/viewgame.php?game=28355

Karen started off so-so, but then became series champion material in the latter half of the game.

Re: Strange Games

Posted: Wed Feb 25, 2009 9:46 am
by Karen Pearson
Chris Davies wrote:http://www.apterous.org/viewgame.php?game=28355

Karen started off so-so, but then became series champion material in the latter half of the game.

Why does that count as strange?

Re: Strange Games

Posted: Wed Feb 25, 2009 11:20 am
by Chris Davies
Karen Pearson wrote:
Chris Davies wrote:http://www.apterous.org/viewgame.php?game=28355

Karen started off so-so, but then became series champion material in the latter half of the game.

Why does that count as strange?
I dunno. :) I thought it noteworthy but couldn't think of any other existing thread in which to post it. In hindsight, it wouldn't have been out of place in the 'comebacks' thread.

Re: Strange Games

Posted: Fri Feb 27, 2009 6:58 pm
by Charlie Reams
Missed out on one of the easiest max games ever. No darrens!

Re: Strange Games

Posted: Sat Feb 28, 2009 5:36 pm
by Dinos Sfyris
Sexy 9s everywhere but only found one between us! http://www.apterous.org/viewgame.php?game=29818

Also for scrag factor I thought 2x2x(50-5) was 190 :oops:

Re: Strange Games

Posted: Tue Mar 03, 2009 1:33 am
by Ben Wilson

Re: Strange Games

Posted: Tue Mar 03, 2009 11:30 am
by Charlie Reams
Didn't Paul have an all-darrens game once?

Edit: Yes

Re: Strange Games

Posted: Tue Mar 03, 2009 12:43 pm
by Joe Denniss
http://www.apterous.org/viewgame.php?game=30833

Check Round 16, where I apparently beat the max.

The score isn't great because it was my first time playing Hyper Numbers...

Edit: I assume this is a common occurrence because it just happened again.

Re: Strange Games

Posted: Tue Mar 03, 2009 1:09 pm
by Ben Wilson
Charlie Reams wrote:
Didn't Paul have an all-darrens game once?

Edit: Yes
Yes, but that was goatdown and my ass-whooping from Prime wasn't.

Re: Strange Games

Posted: Tue Mar 03, 2009 1:15 pm
by Charlie Reams
Ben Wilson wrote:
Charlie Reams wrote:
Didn't Paul have an all-darrens game once?

Edit: Yes
Yes, but that was goatdown and my ass-whooping from Prime wasn't.
Oh, fair enough. For a 15-rounder, 8 darrens is probably a record, yeah.

Re: Strange Games

Posted: Tue Mar 03, 2009 2:13 pm
by Dinos Sfyris
Prime certainly "had" you in round 3 ;)

Re: Strange Games

Posted: Wed Mar 04, 2009 2:21 pm
by Junaid Mubeen
Prime and I got a max game between us, except for the last numbers. However only one round did not feature a beater. Also, every beater was the unique max. We seemed to take in in turns to drop off. Prime the Merciful!

http://www.apterous.org/viewgame.php?game=31130

Re: Strange Games

Posted: Wed Mar 04, 2009 2:23 pm
by Michael Wallace
Junaid Mubeen wrote:Prime and I got a max game between us, except for the last numbers. However only one round did not feature a beater. We seemed to take in in turns to drop off. Prime the Merciful!

http://www.apterous.org/viewgame.php?game=31130
That's a bad miss in round 8.

Re: Strange Games

Posted: Wed Mar 04, 2009 9:07 pm
by Charlie Reams
This must be among the darreniest 9 rounders.

Re: Strange Games

Posted: Thu Mar 05, 2009 7:10 pm
by Ben Wilson

Re: Strange Games

Posted: Sat Mar 07, 2009 11:10 pm
by Kai Laddiman
http://www.apterous.org/viewgame.php?game=32587

Rd 6: a collective term for DC?

Re: Strange Games

Posted: Sat Mar 07, 2009 11:28 pm
by Kai Laddiman
Amazing game this. Deliberately dropped 20 points to make Jimmy happy on audition eve. Knew LEXONERD^ wasn't in, had MINTIER but went for MINUTER^ cos I'd just played MINUTEST (incredible omission) and had TEAMING but played MINUTE for the same reason. I also only picked S in round 14 to make FRUITGELS :P

Re: Strange Games

Posted: Thu Mar 12, 2009 7:54 pm
by Ben Wilson
Deliberate server breakage attempt? Certainly I can pick out at least one round there I could do within the time limit but the computer couldn't.

Re: Strange Games

Posted: Thu Mar 12, 2009 11:00 pm
by Martin Gardner
How about being the first person ever to solve a hyperconundrum in the wrong language? I often guess at these when time runs out, so I guessed at RHINOPLASTIE which turns out to be the French for RHINOPLASTY, but alas not allowed in English

http://www.apterous.org/viewgame.php?game=34762

Re: Strange Games

Posted: Fri Mar 13, 2009 9:35 am
by D Eadie
http://www.apterous.org/viewgame.php?game=34788

Strange indeed that i play my most solid game of the night after half a dozen beers, but earlier on when totally sober i was complete pants. Sometimes even the most common words elude me, then i can pull something pretty obscure out of the hat moments later. Does anyone else suffer from terrible inconsistency or lack of concentration?

Re: Strange Games

Posted: Fri Mar 13, 2009 10:59 am
by Kai Laddiman
Martin Gardner wrote:How about being the first person ever to solve a hyperconundrum in the wrong language?
Possibly.

Re: Strange Games

Posted: Fri Mar 13, 2009 12:07 pm
by Charlie Reams
D Eadie wrote:http://www.apterous.org/viewgame.php?game=34788

Strange indeed that i play my most solid game of the night after half a dozen beers, but earlier on when totally sober i was complete pants. Sometimes even the most common words elude me, then i can pull something pretty obscure out of the hat moments later. Does anyone else suffer from terrible inconsistency or lack of concentration?
It happens to me if I play too much. If I take a few days off then I'm normally much more consistent when I get back.

Re: Strange Games

Posted: Fri Mar 13, 2009 12:17 pm
by Martin Gardner
http://www.apterous.org/viewgame.php?game=34939

Holding Prime to a crucial conundrum in three seconds. I can't count it as brag as I lost!

Re: Strange Games

Posted: Fri Mar 13, 2009 12:23 pm
by Jack Morgan

Re: Strange Games

Posted: Fri Mar 13, 2009 4:38 pm
by Kirk Bevins
Hmmm...check out the time on this conundrum. Super lag?

http://www.apterous.org/viewgame.php?ga ... 63#r517263

Re: Strange Games

Posted: Fri Mar 13, 2009 4:48 pm
by Charlie Reams
Kirk Bevins wrote:Hmmm...check out the time on this conundrum. Super lag?

http://www.apterous.org/viewgame.php?ga ... 63#r517263
The conundrum times are local times, so you can't lag against that. Times like Damian's are caused by some other bug which sometimes makes the clock run slow, which I have been chasing for a while.

Re: Strange Games

Posted: Fri Mar 13, 2009 7:33 pm
by Martin Gardner
In fairness this is more funny because the game ended 20 - 0.

Re: Strange Games

Posted: Fri Mar 13, 2009 11:37 pm
by Jojo Apollo
This was a 15 Rounder game, but it is strangely marked down as a Custom game:http://www.apterous.org/viewgame.php?game=25484 the score became tied after the 15th round and it took five tiebreak conundrums to separate us, as we didn't get any of the previous four tiebreak conundrums. :oops:

Re: Strange Games

Posted: Fri Mar 13, 2009 11:49 pm
by Kai Laddiman
Me and Innis + Hypergoatdown = this :P

Re: Strange Games

Posted: Sat Mar 14, 2009 12:22 am
by D Eadie
Charlie Reams wrote:
Kirk Bevins wrote:Hmmm...check out the time on this conundrum. Super lag?

http://www.apterous.org/viewgame.php?ga ... 63#r517263
The conundrum times are local times, so you can't lag against that. Times like Damian's are caused by some other bug which sometimes makes the clock run slow, which I have been chasing for a while.

Tends to only happen when i play at work - on my break times of course. The lag is horrible and often i get just 6 or 7 letters on screen, only to find that the bot has already answered Almost impossible to beat Prime at a game in this situation. I tend to get the first 2 rnds okay, then it slows up bigtime and eventually freezes altogether. When i answer straight away, it registers on the clock as anything between 5 and 10 secs, even though i've only just got the 9 letters up on screen.

Re: Strange Games

Posted: Sat Mar 14, 2009 1:06 am
by Kevin Davis
http://www.apterous.org/viewgame.php?game=35331

Seven rounds of Jekyll, six of Hyde.

So surprising was the recovery, that Jimmy warned me that "cheating was bad, Charlie willl know"...bless him.

Re: Strange Games

Posted: Sat Mar 14, 2009 2:19 am
by Kirk Bevins
Ha, only just spotted the word spelled out in round 11

http://www.apterous.org/viewgame.php?game=35352

Re: Strange Games

Posted: Sat Mar 14, 2009 10:05 am
by Martin Gardner
Ben Wilson wrote:Deliberate server breakage attempt? Certainly I can pick out at least one round there I could do within the time limit but the computer couldn't.
Interesting round 9. I'm pretty sure it is possible, although the computer says you can't get within 10. Either they should both get a point for maxing (with nothing) or the max for the whole game should be 19, not 20. Very very slight bug I suppose.