COOT 08 Quarter-Final - Wilson vs Howe

Discussion and announcements relating to unofficial Countdown competitions, held online or in real life. Observation, discussion, reflection, and other stuff ending in -ion.
Post Reply
User avatar
Charlie Reams
Site Admin
Posts: 9494
Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 2:33 pm
Location: Cambridge
Contact:

COOT 08 Quarter-Final - Wilson vs Howe

Post by Charlie Reams »

The second COOT quarter-final, played on Tuesday 8 July 2008, was between Ben Wilson and Paul Howe. Ben Wilson is best known as the only man ever to score zero in an online game. Paul Howe is best known for losing quite a lot of semi-finals. So this game should be pretty shit, right?

C1: Challenger Ben Wilson.
C2: Challenger Paul Howe.

R01: H X G D E I A N T
R02: B M N D I A O O A
R03: L P K T U E O M E
R04: R R P P U O A I E
R05: 25, 100, 50, 9, 10, 5. Target: 416.
TTT: HEYGITES - "Eating carrots supposedly helps to improve this"
R06: N R S D A I E L E
R07: T G P N O E I R G
R08: S J B S U O A T W
R09: R S H F E E O L R
R10: 100, 3, 7, 10, 4, 1. Target: 444.
TTT: DEERPEAS - "a plant that has been sexually assaulted perhaps!"
R11: N S T Q U A I E Y
R12: F S T L O E A L C
R13: D R T C I A E E I
R14: 100, 5, 1, 10, 8, 1. Target: 952.
R15: P E E R H O U R S (conundrum)


SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER
SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER
SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER
SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER
SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER
SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER
SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER
SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER
SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER
SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER
SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER
SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER
SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER
SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER
SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER
SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER
SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER
SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER
SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER
SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER


Round 1: H X G D E I A N T

C1: HEADING (7)
C2: HEATING (7)
Score: 7–7 (max 7)

Round 2: B M N D I A O O A

C1: DOMAIN (6)
C2: DOMINO (6)
OT: ANOMIA (6) DAIMON (6) INDABA (6) MAIDAN (6)
Score: 13–13 (max 13)

Round 3: L P K T U E O M E

C1: TEMPLE (6)
C2: TUPELO (6)
OT: EELPOUT (7)
Score: 19–19 (max 20)

Round 4: R R P P U O A I E

C1: REPAIR (6)
C2: RAPIER (6)
OT: PARURE (6) PAUPER (6) POURER (6) PROPER (6) RAPPER (6) RIPPER (6) RIPRAP (6) ROPIER (6) UPROAR (6)
Score: 25–25 (max 26)

Round 5: 25, 100, 50, 9, 10, 5. Target: 416.

C1: 416. (50-100/25)x9+10/5 (10)
C2: 416. (10+5+100/50)x25-9 (10)
Score: 35–35 (max 36)

The players totally inseparable after 5 rounds, with only one missed word (EELPOUT) between them. Can they maintain the standard?

Teatime teaser: HEYGITES -> EYESIGHT

Round 6: N R S D A I E L E

C1: ISLANDER (8)
C2: ISLANDER (8)
OT: ARSENIDE (8) NEARSIDE (8) REALISED (8) REDLINES (8) SIDEREAL (8)
Score: 43–43 (max 44)

Round 7: T G P N O E I R G

C1: GROPING (7)
C2: GROPING (7)
OT: GENITOR (7) PIROGEN (7) POINTER (7) PONGIER (7) PORTING (7) PROTEIN (7) REPOINT (7) TRIGONE (7)
Score: 50–50 (max 51)

Round 8: S J B S U O A T W

C1: SABOTS (6)
C2: SABOTS (6)
OT: BOASTS (6) JABOTS (6) JOUSTS (6) TSUBAS (6) TSUBOS (6)
Score: 56–56 (max 57)

Round 9: R S H F E E O L R

C1: REFRESH (7)
C2: HERSELF (7)
OT: FLESHER (7) FRESHER (7)
Score: 63–63 (max 64)

Round 10: 100, 3, 7, 10, 4, 1. Target: 444.

C1: 444. (100+10+1)x4 (10)
C2: 444. (100+10+1)x4 (10)
Score: 73–73 (max 74)

A straightforward second half sees both players max every round to maintain the deadlock, with still only one miss between them!

Teatime teaser: DEERPEAS -> RAPESEED

Round 11: N S T Q U A I E Y

C1: ANTIQUES (8)
C2: QUANTISE (8)
OT: QUINATES (8)
Score: 81–81 (max 82)

Round 12: F S T L O E A L C

C1: COLLATES (8)
C2: FLOATELS (8)
Score: 89–89 (max 90)

Round 13: D R T C I A E E I

C1: CATERED (7)
C2: CREATED (7)
Score: 96–96 (max 97)

Round 14: 100, 5, 1, 10, 8, 1. Target: 952.

C1: 952. (100-5)x10+1+1 (10)
C2: 952. (100-5)x10+1+1 (10)
Score: 106–106 (max 107)

So, it would be a sudden death conundrum to decide the game!

Round 15: P E E R H O U R S

Ben buzzes on 3 seconds to say SUPERHERO which is correct. Wow!
Score: 116–106 (max 117)

Totally awesome game. Admittedly there were quite a few flat rounds, but both players raised their game when it mattered and you can't knock a 98% joint total. Good luck in the next round, Ben!
JasonCullen
Devotee
Posts: 712
Joined: Thu Feb 14, 2008 5:43 pm
Location: Bolton, Greater Manchester
Contact:

Re: COOT 08 Quarter-Final - Wilson vs Howe

Post by JasonCullen »

OT: EDITRICE (8) - a rare contestant-beater from Jason Cullen
Don't sound so surprised Charlie :D . I gotta get credit for something :lol:

Anyhow, an amazing game to watch and certainly the best game of this tourny so far IMO
User avatar
Charlie Reams
Site Admin
Posts: 9494
Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 2:33 pm
Location: Cambridge
Contact:

Re: COOT 08 Quarter-Final - Wilson vs Howe

Post by Charlie Reams »

jasoncullen wrote:
OT: EDITRICE (8) - a rare contestant-beater from Jason Cullen
Don't sound so surprised Charlie :D . I gotta get credit for something :lol:
I meant it was rare for there to be a contestant beater, rather than rare for you to get it.
JasonCullen
Devotee
Posts: 712
Joined: Thu Feb 14, 2008 5:43 pm
Location: Bolton, Greater Manchester
Contact:

Re: COOT 08 Quarter-Final - Wilson vs Howe

Post by JasonCullen »

Charlie Reams wrote:
jasoncullen wrote:
OT: EDITRICE (8) - a rare contestant-beater from Jason Cullen
Don't sound so surprised Charlie :D . I gotta get credit for something :lol:
I meant it was rare for there to be a contestant beater, rather than rare for you to get it.
Oh right Charlie :D . Sorry :roll:
Julian Fell
Series 48 Champion
Posts: 481
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 7:08 pm

Re: COOT 08 Quarter-Final - Wilson vs Howe

Post by Julian Fell »

Actually EDITRICE isn't in the current edition of the dictionary - it was in the NODE, so that's maybe where Jason got it from (it doesn't come up in CountMax). So Ben and Paul in fact only missed one maximum between them in the whole game (not counting the conundrum)! The rest of the tournament will have a job keeping up with this standard... really well played both; well done Ben & hard luck Paul.

(Edit to say: FERRELS isn't in the ODE2r either)
User avatar
Charlie Reams
Site Admin
Posts: 9494
Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 2:33 pm
Location: Cambridge
Contact:

Re: COOT 08 Quarter-Final - Wilson vs Howe

Post by Charlie Reams »

I was using a wordlist from Damian who insisted that it was the latest version, but it looks ever more likely that it was actually the NODE. Will edit recap accordingly.
Paul Howe
Kiloposter
Posts: 1070
Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2008 2:25 pm

Re: COOT 08 Quarter-Final - Wilson vs Howe

Post by Paul Howe »

Julian Fell wrote:Actually EDITRICE isn't in the current edition of the dictionary - it was in the NODE, so that's maybe where Jason got it from (it doesn't come up in CountMax). So Ben and Paul in fact only missed one maximum between them in the whole game (not counting the conundrum)! The rest of the tournament will have a job keeping up with this standard... really well played both; well done Ben & hard luck Paul.

(Edit to say: FERRELS isn't in the ODE2r either)
Hah, I no longer feel annoyed about not having the cojones to offer it. Not that it would've made any difference to the final outcome, I got merked :(
User avatar
Damian E
Enthusiast
Posts: 460
Joined: Tue Jan 29, 2008 9:51 am

Re: COOT 08 Quarter-Final - Wilson vs Howe

Post by Damian E »

Charlie Reams wrote:I was using a wordlist from Damian who insisted that it was the latest version, but it looks ever more likely that it was actually the NODE. Will edit recap accordingly.

Sorry - i thought it was the latest version, we'll its the latest version i have. It is in fact the NODE as you said Charlie. Will seek an update from OUP.
Post Reply