Aye, no problem with that.Matt Morrison wrote:R12: WANNEST ok for an equaller, as in 'most wan' ?
I thought Cate was on for a century there, easy.
Aye, no problem with that.Matt Morrison wrote:R12: WANNEST ok for an equaller, as in 'most wan' ?
Yep.Mike Brailsford wrote:FILAGREED for 9 ?
Cool, this means I can claim a moral victory...erm, sort of.Charlie Reams wrote:Haha. Umm...Dinos Sfyris wrote:How come people did one of 2 different duels yesterday?
D Eadie wrote:Vampire Weekend...........as you'll soon discover.
Dictionary changes afoot?Ezra Koenig wrote:Who gives a fuck about an Oxford comma?
Hahaha, that's it! I've been trying to think who it was all evening. Cheers, Paul!Paul Hammond wrote:Yes. In the director's box at Chelski. He seems to have almost completely lost his accent though, remarkable.Matt Morrison wrote:Does anyone else feel like they've seen Steven somewhere before?
Paul couldn't have been much more spot-on. One point out.Paul Howe wrote:My prediction is 924 points
Just one game left, Jojo, and Kirk needs 114. Well within his compass, I think.Jojo Apollo wrote:Is the record points total for 8 wins still in with a realistic chance?
How much would Kirk have to average in his last two games (if he wins them) to beat the record?
Paul Hammond wrote:No, Leeds is definitely not US territory.
I don't know. Were Fred and Tom attending a party at Michael Barrymore's house?Lesley Jeavons wrote:Fred lies naked in the corner, surrounded by broken glass in a pool of liquid, while Tom cowers shivering in the corner.
What happened prior to this?
Even if a television company was deluded enough to think it was a good idea, I don't think he'd be interested, Jason. It's not really his "thing".Jason Larsen wrote:Would Des be capable of hosting a revival of Take Your Pick if he were tapped?
You mean 1/5 (against), or 5/1 on. 1/5 on is a weird way of saying 5/1. But if you're offering 1/5 on, I'll have a tenner on Kirk please.Matt Morrison wrote:Kirk must be 1/5 on to become an octochamp
That's because it is. If you lose a game through tiredness or whatever, then you've lost.tonywarren wrote:He seems to think it is a simple contest between two people and to the winner the spoils.
Of course you should - you'd've scored 94 if I hadn't been evil and got the conundrum firstEoin Monaghan wrote:I should now have no reason to hate Jim Bentley- but I still doCharlie Reams wrote:New speed 9 record, 1 point off the max.
Carol's way was bizarre but cool. I'd have done 75+50+10+10-(100/25), much more straightforward.Martin Gardner wrote:Round five of this game is a strong contender for the best round where it's easy to get one away, but hard to get it spot on.
I hope you weren't in your car, Jason, that would have been awful!Jason Larsen wrote:I was just thinking about someone who I ran into recently!